Is the aim of our legal system to always serve the truth?

The idea that the aim of the legal system is to always serve the truth is not entirely accurate. The legal system is fundamentally focused on upholding the rule of law, protecting the rights of individuals, and ensuring justice is served, all of which do not always align with a straightforward pursuit of truth.

In many cases, the legal system may prioritize procedural justice, the rights of the accused, and the burden of proof, which can sometimes lead to outcomes that do not reflect the absolute truth of a situation. For instance, the system is built on adversarial principles, where two parties present their cases, and the determination is made based on the evidence and arguments presented rather than an exhaustive pursuit of the factual truth.

Additionally, the legal system's structure focuses on protecting individual rights and ensuring fair trials, meaning that truth can sometimes take a backseat to legal procedures and protections. Therefore, recognizing that the system has multiple aims—such as justice and rights protection—is crucial in understanding its complexities, making the assertion that it always serves the truth inaccurate.