Should everyone resolve the same moral dilemma in the same way?

The idea that everyone should resolve the same moral dilemma in the same way suggests a rigid framework for ethical decision-making, which does not encompass the complexities of individual circumstances, cultural backgrounds, personal values, and situational contexts. Ethical dilemmas often involve subjective interpretations of right and wrong, where different people may reach different conclusions based on their experiences and beliefs.

Recognizing that moral reasoning can vary from person to person, the notion of subjective ethics supports the idea that what one individual perceives as the ethical choice may not resonate with another's perspective. This flexibility is essential in a diverse society where varying moral philosophies coexist, and it underscores the importance of dialogue and understanding in ethical discussions.

Thus, the answer highlights the inherent variability in moral decisions and the value of acknowledging different viewpoints rather than enforcing a singular approach to complex moral issues.