What does strict legal liability require to prove negligence in design or manufacturing?

Strict legal liability holds manufacturers and designers legally responsible for defects in their products regardless of whether negligence can be proven. However, for strict liability to apply, it must be demonstrated that a defect exists in either the design or the manufacturing process.

In the context of negligence associated with design or manufacturing, proof of some form of negligence is indeed required to establish that a product did not meet accepted safety standards or was unsafe for consumer use, resulting in harm. This concept is fundamentally tied to ensuring that products are designed and manufactured safely and to established guidelines, making it crucial for plaintiffs to show that some negligence was present in the design or manufacturing process.

The other options, while related to different aspects of liability and legal standards, do not accurately define the requirements for proving negligence in the context of strict legal liability. Proof of intent to harm is generally irrelevant in strict liability cases, and proving only financial loss without establishing a defect or some form of negligence does not meet the requirements of legal accountability for harm caused by a product.